
About MeI'm a very old young man, at least i feel that way. I'm a Bruneian (look it up.) with too much time on my hands. I do sports, music, creative writing and more often jackass activities with my brothers-in-arms (henceforth B.I.As). Currently i'm in a relationship with probably the most wonderful lady in the whole wide world (yes, Puss-In-Boots eyes), Missy 156. She's the star of my life! =) (Which is saying something, i am SeVenStaRs, no?) I'll update this when i have something to say.
LinksThe Girls @ NRMy Missy =D Deez Huntress Ryme Phoenix Lancer Alai Jedi Graduates.com atul5353 DingY Imparfaition Adhilles Rawini Zephyr Sheena Ain SZ OS Ardi Your SayCreditsBloggerInsomniac Creations |
Friday, April 08, 2005In response to... hoohaa & Random ReaderOkay, this is getting personal. hoohaa - Ok, ko start becakap kasar arah aku, aku cakap kasar balik arah ko jua. Satu, ko pikir ko gagah lah tu mempost as a random tagger? Aku wang berani becakap, walaupun urg tau kan siapa tuan milik site ani, pasalnya aku nda penakut macam kau. Mun ko kan mijak parut ku maritah, aku menunggu kau. Ko tau aku belajar dimana, kan? Mun ko na tau, aku belajar di Manchester. Maritah turun mun ko kan nunjuk gagah. Talk is cheap, boy. Back your words with actions. Dua, mun ko kan mempost cerita pasal aku arah site mu (kalau ko ada banar, nda pulang ku heran tu kalau ada) POST TAH. Mun banar cerita2 mu atu bah apa buleh ku buat. Ko sendiri cakap ko ada the right kan? Sama macam aku, aku posted something on my site because i have a right to post on what choose to post. Kalau aku kan mempost si anu bin si anu ani perasan kuat (contohnya tah kau), so what? Kalau si anu ani take offense, ia sendiri bah mengaga aku, meminta aku take the post down, or alter the wording. Yang ko ani marah2 apa bisnes mu? Tiga, stories aku ani memang valid from my point of view. Atu jgn sekali2 lupa. My views, my beliefs, not anyone else's. Kamu buleh percaya, atau nda percaya. That depends on the reader, atu kamu sendiri punya pasal. This is my site, kan? Aku na pajal kamu kemari, aku na gitau 'Hari2 kamu mesti aga site ku'. Memang ani the WWW, and this here's my space. Mun kamu aga bruneistudent.com lagi bagus2 tu the comments on the video. Cuba baca disana lagi. Aku na nampak pun urg yg melawan comments urg psl the video disana. Kenapa, takut? Any taggers yg mengkomen secara kasar ka, secara lambut ka, memang ku balas balik sama mcm apa yg di tagnya. Mcm ko bah, hoohaa. Mun ko kan get physical sama aku, bah jgn cakap saja. Ko turun kemari, bawa tia segala kuncu2 mu. Jgn ko silap, tuan milik site ani bukan nya sanang2 kan kamu makan, mentang2lah aku ada website ko pikir aku ani jenis nerd, jenis tuyu? Hoohaa, aku bukan kebaruan mcm ko arah dunia2 bekelaie apa ani, iatah malas ku kan mempost panjang psl the incident atu. Alum berapa bah tu bui, just a couple of kids who think they're all that. Jgntah nda merati kan abis2 ani. p.s. Just because you don't understand the words that i use on this site, doesn't mean that i'm trying to look smart. It means that you need to catch up on your vocabulary classes, boy. Use your head, not your dick. p.p.s. Excuse me, but you're telling me to get a life? You're the one trying to lose your life, by threatening a KBian with physical violence. That's not too wise, in fact that's downright stupid, you dumbass. p.p.p.s. Hehe. So i provoked the booing, eh? How sad for people like you to grasp on straws to try and prove something. I didn't need to do anything, everyone started the booing, from one end of the UK to the other and everyone else in between. If you were actually there, in the crowd, you'd know that. I just 'helped' it along, that's all. Hah. Second one on the line, Random Reader. RR - Did you read any of my other posts? If you did, you'd find that i do accept criticism, but if and only if the criticism is presented in such a way as to actually felicitate a response that is meant to improve the site that i maintain. However, if the criticism was meant to inflamme, as a form of verbal attack on my person, that is when i do react. In that i agree with you, my words were indeed harsh. But i find it strange when the persons 'doing the reacting' is from neither sides of the equation, i.e. from one team or the other(notice i still do not mention any team names, i will not breach my own personal rules) but rather from those people who were on the bylines, the same as myself. Why are these people incensed by what i write? Why do they say that i should mind my own business, why i'm wrong, why my views are biased, etc etc? Who are they to have the ability much less the right to limit what I am capable of saying? Easy question. They are the friends of the team whom i touched on in that post. Friends do react when a member of their own cliques are harrassed, injured, beaten up, verbally abused, etc. This is an oft-repeated truth, as friendship is an intangible matter, whose values sometimes transcends the realms of the rationale right into the arena of pure unadulterated stupidity. But that is what friends are for. I understand that as well as anybody else. However, when anyone start to verbalise threats on my person or anyone else within my own sphere, that is when I start to react. When anyone starts to use a football game as a pretext to petty, childish forms of revenge, i do react. When someone starts to beat a friend of mine up, i react. When a GROUP of people start to beat a friend of mine up, i react. And indeed, the guy getting a beatdown is a friend of mine. Enough excuse, no? So in saying that, this fight is of my concern. Think back, RR. Do you have any friends? The answer to that would most probably be 'yes'. Would you stand up for them if they really were your friends? If your answer is 'no', then i understand, and i pity you. On another matter, i mentioned that team as being defending champions as they did win another tournament held before the Easter Games. In organising things, winners are categorised by how many of the two yearly held tournaments they won. If they won the first one (held in winter), they're the defending champions. If another team won the Easter Games, then they're the new champions. Just wanted to clarify things for you, RR. I would also have to disagree with your view that the fight was not about sore losers. I do this because of my knowledge of some words which were exchanged between members of one team and their supporters prior to the match, which led me to believe that this match had a hint of sour grapes. Perhaps personal matters had more of the influencing factor? It is your belief that the goalkeeper instigated the brawl by namecalling. It is my belief that this fight started a long time ago, long before the Easter Games. In your view, the goalie provoked the other team for a fight. And yes, he did get a fight. If what you say is true, then that is the way of things. But one question, though : is your definition of a fight 4 guys punching, stomping and kicking another person in the head while this guy was lying down? Is your definition of a fight a person being punched by another from behind whilst the victim was 'engaged in conversation' with another? Now that, i believe, is not a fight. That is cowardice. Ganging on another, suckerpunch from behind, kicks to the head whilst victim is on the floor, the video shows it all. That is why the controversy on my site started, because of me disagreeing with the tactics employed by one team in ganging on another. If you have even a shred of human decency, you'd think about it again, RR. Feel free to tell me the result of those thoughts. One last point i am going to disagree upon, is 'Bruneians are ****ing busybodies!'. Its not only Bruneians, its everybody who's at least a quarter human. We all have feelings of empathy, of inquistiveness, of wanting to know what's up. If humans weren't such busybodies, then there'll be no such thing as organised aid for a worthy cause, such as War Relief for Palestine, or Tsunami Aid for Acheh. Don't think that these noble causes and what us Bruneians (i'm presuming you are also a Bruneian, 'cause if you're not, then you are in deep shit.) do as you so aptly put it is not the same. If i did not care for what happened to my neighbour, then should i go and pour water onto his burning house? Of course not. All these controversies, harsh words exchanged between debating members of this issue, stems from emotions, whether vengeful, empathy, anger, etc. I am stating my empathy for the goalie being beaten up by a group of people, whilst at the same time stating my anger at such acts of cowardice. If you were at least a quarter human, RR, then you'd understand that. My suggestion to you is to be a tryharder. Heh. P.s. Hoohaa - there you go, a course in Linguistics (the section for RR if you don't catch my drift). Now sit down, grab some pencil and paper, a dictionary, and start reading. It'll be good for you. SeVenStaRs, out. posted by SeVenStaRs @ 3:36 PM
0
comments |
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home